Archive for March, 2008

500 and Smirking

Sunday, March 23rd, 2008

Today, the Quote Archive hit a new milestone when the 500th quote was added (quote might not be visible through RSS Readers):

provided by FocalPower

I find myself smirking at the fact that this is the historic 500th quote. :-)

The Quote Archive became public about a year ago this month. Since that time, the archive has gone through spurts of growth, especially since the ability for anyone to submit quotes to the Archive went live. To all those who have helped contribute to the success of the archive, Thanks You!

To all of those who have enjoyed the archive by sharing it’s quotes on your website or blog, had a spark of enlightenment or enjoyment hit when reading a quote from the archive, or sent us your kind words of encouragement…your support makes the archive possible!

We look forward to seeing all the new and wonderful quotes related to photography that the community will add in the future!

Another Angle of Facebook’s Rights Grab

Saturday, March 15th, 2008

A recent post by Jim Goldstein about Facebook’s rights grab raises some timely issues for photographers regarding protecting their rights. I wanted to share an alternative view of this situation along with some things that FocalPower is working on that helps to address this recurring problem.

First, photographers need to be extra aware of their legal rights around their work and how those rights can be impacted when ever they put a photo anywhere (digitally or physically), consider it Photo Business 101. However, in today’s world you can’t afford to not place your photos online; there is too much potential for missed exposure and revenue. Some photographers are rightfully cautious and place a small resolution set of images online. The thinking goes that if someone were to steal the image and try to make a print, they can’t make that big of one. The reality is that if someone takes your image from a website and tries to make a print, there are limitations to the quality just by the nature of the photo being online. Photos online are resized to 72pdi and converted to the sRGB color space because that is the optimal settings for online viewing; these are also not optimal or even that great for printing an image.

I would rather go in the other direction. I want to place a large image online. I want my viewers to be able to view as large of an image of my work as possible so they can appreciate the detail and push them over the emotial edge of buying my work. This is exactly what FocalPower is working on providing (we already have it in an early alpha release).

Beyond that, I also want to (no, make that need to) be able to share my images in the multitude of places online where there are huge audiences and the potential to increase the visibility of my work. And this goes well beyond the typical having samples of my images on Flickr. For most photographers, Flickr will not drive new business to you as most people on Flickr are other photographers and, as I have said before, the quality of the reviews you can get on Flickr are not worth the effort. FocalPower is also working on this issue as well. Being able mange photos centrally but yet share them anywhere you need to in order to increase awareness or spread your brand.

An Alternative View of FaceBook’s Terms

With recent experience in building apps for Facebook, I know that in order to provide the fastest possible viewing experience for their users, they do a lot of work to keep content close to their servers. Most of the popular applications on Facebook are actually running in the same data centers as Facebook. This means that when users access a page that contains that application, the application will run as fast as the page.

I have a hunch that most of the legalize in the Facebook Terms was placed there by lawyers trying to protect Facebook from what the engineers had come up with to ensure a fast responding site. By caching some of the smaller images, those that get displayed the most based on how Facebook works, Facebook can guarantee that their site will perform fast for their users even if the site where the content is originally published is not performing fast.

Does this make it right for Facebook to do this? No!

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think this is the right thing for Facebook to be doing behind the scense without being completely transparent about it. When they were dealing with a primary audience of College students, the user’s didn’t really care. Now that they are trying to grow and expand beyond that audience, the users are much more savvy and care about these facts. Something that I think Facebook is slowly starting to realized considering they just hired a new COO who understands these type of issues. Unfortunately, even with a new COO on board, the company might not actually change their ways until their customer base raises enough of a noise about the issue.

So, where does this leave photographers with sharing their photos on Facebook’s ever growing audience base? That is a decision that each photographer must make on their own. Personally, I would never upload a photo to a site that took my rights away, I can’t think of a short term gain that would be big enough for that long term loss. The good news is that this is getting awareness amongst photographers. Is it now time to raise that awareness officially to Facebook?